×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
On 3/2/2017 8:00 AM, Justin Taylor wrote:
Given a theoretical app with development, QC and production
libraries. The devs send a new build to the QC library and continue
work in the development library. 1-2 weeks later, the QC department
returns their report, and code and data changes are required in the
QC build.
Is there a best practice for percolating those changes to the
development library?
<vendor mode="on">
A good quality Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) system will encourage (and enforce) a strong development flow like you describe.
I know that PTC Implementer provides for a very robust check out, development, deployment, rejection, and concurrent development work flow. It also supports separation of duties so that developers can't deploy to production unless they are authorized.
I'm sure the other ALM products support similar functionality.
If you would like some information on Implementer, feel free to contact me privately.
</vendor>
david
(who works for PTC, on the Implementer product, in addition to running midrange.com)
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
