×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
My take on your initial post was that you missed the meat of the discussion which I thought was about why you can't use TLS/SSL with MSF to relay.
It's not an option so there have to be other choices selected to help with secure mail relaying.
I'm not sure there's much of a compare/contrast approach on this discussion other than MSF old and MSF not a good way for long term mail relaying so users must select workaround options as they go forward.
Regards,
Richard Schoen
Director of Document Management
e. richard.schoen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
p. 952.486.6802
w. helpsystems.com
------------------------------
message: 4
date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 13:58:43 -0700
from: Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: Email direct from IBM i without relay (was: New lower
cost IBMi announced)
Well, I'll try, but when I see "benefits" quoted like that I get the
impression that you're less interested in hearing than arguing.
That kind of hurts. If I've earned a reputation for arguing, I hope my points are viewed as arguing respectfully. I debated myself about quoting "benefits", which was intended to suggest my having doubts, which I do. But I admit that scanning for outbound viruses is a point worth considering.
HTH,
Nathan.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
