It is tiny indeed, but allowed. P8. They needed to do that since with P8
0.1 is still quite a bit of processor, and many folks run partitions smaller
than that. I have several customers that create virtualized partitions for
each of their developers so they have a completely independent environment.
(Pluses and minuses for that technique) I also have customers that set up
partitions that way to have them idle until needed then they push
processor/memory over. One runs month end that way( replication keeps
database up to date)
I'm guessing by other questions, Rob ran into a bug in the FSP code, since
he was asking about the expiration date on it.
--
Jim Oberholtzer
Agile Technology Architects
-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Nathan Andelin
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 12:42 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Dynamically lpar 0.05 CPU
Boss suggested I dynamically lpar 0.05 CPU from one lpar to another.
Do you mean 0.05 of one core? I seem to recall that IBM used to require a
0.1 core minimum. I assume that even smaller portions of a core are possible
now. But 0.05 seems tiny.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe,
or change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.
Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate link:
http://amzn.to/2dEadiD
midrange.com
