×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
We have a process that copies 16.7M records from one native table to
another in 13 minutes, then use CPYTOIMPF to convert this to a .CSV file,
which takes 1 hour, 39 minutes. The command:
CpyToImpF FromFile(CSVWRK/&TC_IQXnnnH) +
ToStmF( '/csvwrk/' *cat &FileNamNoX *tcat '.csv' ) +
MbrOpt( *Replace ) StmfCCSID( *PCASCII ) +
RcdDlm( *CRLF ) RmvBlank( *Both ) +
OrderBy( IQXSequenc )
FWIW, this is on V7R1 with recent PTFs and TRs. The job shows the input
file is being read in 117-record blocks. Record length is 239 bytes with
29 fields. I also tested the above command without the OrderBy parameter,
but difference in time to complete was insignificant (2 minutes difference).
I thought I had seen a recent thread that claimed that one of Scott
Klement's utilities performed faster than CPYTO???F (can't remember if it
was CPYTOIMPF or CPYTOSTMF), but I came up empty searching for that
thread. Does anyone remember, or was I imagining things?
- Dan
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
