× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Agree, one should be very careful on that setup - and a mirrored environment is still highly recommended.
The only advantage of ZFS is using a slight compression to reduce the amount of disk accesses
(converting 528b IBM i blocks to 512b physical blocks). To increase performance, one can add some
disks to IBM i which are provided by an SVC cluster.

ZFS with loads of IBM i writes can be pain, yes…

-h



Am 27.04.2016 um 21:59 schrieb DrFranken <midrange@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:

I am also not at all comfortable with IBM i's single level store on a ZFS file system as I have yet to wrap my head around the vast differences between them and the potential performance implications there. Plus if your ZFS file system reboots for any reason things from the past can return, it's part of the way ZFS works! (I'm not going to explain that here) How would IBM i react to block of data reverting? Damaged objects come to mind.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.