Would seem reasonable to just ask to have the
Edit command publicly authorized similar to the
others.? There is unlikely to be anything valid
offered to support their decision to have
disallowed the one while allowing the others.?

One word answer: Auditors.

To be fair, I've not been here long enough to know the history of how
things came to be. I've known of other shops that have "negotiated" with
auditors, explaining the need to have access to certain things, but I'm not
sure whether they've done any of that here. We also do not have access to
CRTLIB / CPYLIB here. To me, this just screams that the auditors have no
effing idea what they're doing.

- Dan

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2020 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].