×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.




Scott K. mentioned the two to use for home grown tools. One thing to
know about these is that typical use is to dump the results into a User
Space and the typical storage is single level. This presents a problem
if your OUTQ contains a large quantity (dozens of thousands of entries).
The APIs run for a long time and then crash because the user space is
full and cannot be extended. I had not yet tested at what quantity
level that occurs at as the test time is quite long. A work around for
QUSLSPL is to supply a value for the User Data parameter. What
performance enhancements there are for QGYOLSPL I cannot say, since I
have not used this one much.



Thanks, Matt




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.