Re: SMBJOB - with delay

John,

Originally, was told the sbmjob would work, which it does most of the time.
This is a very slight timing issue.

A CL with a DO loop would work and is probably the simplest to implement.

Calling a pgrm to return the future date and time would also work, but not
guaranteed as the DO loop.

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
John Yeung
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 4:38 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: SMBJOB - with delay

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Steinmetz, Paul <PSteinmetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Rob,

The reason for the separate job is you can't hold the AJS job while it

running, can't hold yourself, nothing to do with authority.

Maybe I'm being dense (a very good possibility!), but I'm still not seeing
why you can't just use a DO loop around the HLDJOBJS, which was Rob's
*actual* first suggestion, which he dismissed out of hand because he
figured you would already be using it if you could.

John Y.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.