× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Jeff,

I apologize, I thought it was part of the same issue as before.

These were the PTFs for that

V7R1 - SI53118
V6R1 - SI53483

I would certainly open a APAR with IBM if this is something new.

Brad

On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Jeff Crosby <jlcrosby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Brad,

There's a fixing PTF?

This isn't the SI51172 from a while back that was in error and fixed
by SI52478.
How do I find if there's a fixing PTF for SI54738? Open a PMR?



On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Bradley Stone <bvstone@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The error is in the PTF. ESEND obviously uses the QtmmSendMail API which
was broken by a recent PTF, but is fixed by another one not included in
the
CUME.

That is an assumption of course. I remember when we were talking with
IBM
the PTF did cause the problem, but IBM also found some other ISV (I don't
think it was Help Systems) did have some invalid parameter lengths in the
call to the QtmmSendMail API.

Have you tried applying the fix PTF?

Brad
www.bvstools.com

On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 7:11 AM, Jeff Crosby <jlcrosby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

I contacted HelpSystems (providers of ESEND) support. At their
suggestion
I did the following:

1) I first set QSECOFR user profile to PUBLIC *EXCLUDE (which is what
it
used to be) and left it there.

2) I removed PTF 5770-TC1 SI54738, did ENDMSF and ENDTCPSVR(*SMTP),
followed by STRMSF and STRTCPSVR(*SMTP). The email went out fine.

3) I then reapplied the PTF, did ENDMSF and ENDTCPSVR(*SMTP), followed
by
STRMSF and STRTCPSVR(*SMTP). The email errored out with the error I
originally reported.

4) To be sure, I removed the PTF again, did ENDMSF and
ENDTCPSVR(*SMTP),
followed by STRMSF and STRTCPSVR(*SMTP). The email again went out
fine.

So it definitely looks like this PTF is what caused the error. Now the
question: is the PTF in error or is ESEND not doing something right?

Awaiting their response.





As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.