Good News Everybody!
The new search engine is LIVE!
Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.
|
Forgive me for butting in here, because I have absolutely no--
experience with VIOS or blades or PureFlex or whatever, but a thought
keeps creeping into my head.
We're going backwards.
The IBM i is supposed to be simple to manage. This doesn't sound like
it's making things simpler. Are we going to get to a point where the
"Laughing Boardroom" ads don't apply anymore?
Just my .02.
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Vernon Hamberg<vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
I won't say that the FSM of PureFlex does everything, but I
believe it IS a graphical interface to managing those boxes -
wouldn't it be nice to get that for other places?
Has anyone used it? Is it much more GUI than, say, HMC?
On 5/21/2013 6:08 AM,rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> VIOS is probably linux based. And many of those Linux
propeller heads > aren't as open to GUI as IBM i users are. At
least that's what IBM told > me when I asked for an enhancement
to System i Navigator for Windows > support for semaphores and
threads. They rejected the request because > true aficionados of semaphores and threads eschew GUI.
>
>
> Rob Berendt
--
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.