× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Now that I didn't know! Of course after seeing Rob's response, maybe my best bet is to do both!

Thanks so much. Anything that improves my performance is highly appreciated.

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of TheBorg
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 10:07 AM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Two trigger programs allowed on a file. Maybe more allowed?

I quit using the search feature in the IBM Information Center.

I now use Google to search for stuff on IBM sites, using 'site:ibm.com" in the search string to force it to search the IBM site.

In fact, I attended a User-Centered Design session (got a T-shirt!) in Rochester almost 10 years ago and expressed my frustration with the search feature in the Information Center, and some of the IBM'ers admitted that it wasn't very good.

- sjl


"Raymond B. Dunn" wrote in message
news:mailman.4859.1369061731.7202.midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx...

I use the search function on the IBM website.

My comments may have been a little strong, but lately I have really had problems finding things in the manuals.

I am the cutting edge guy here, so I have no one to bounce things off of.
In addition, I am the one who is expected to be able to resolve the problems none of my coworkers are able to. I have two resources: You guys (thank
god) (and the other internet sites) and the manuals. I would love to be able to effectively use the manuals. I just seem to have a great deal of trouble finding things in the manual, which in the past was never a problem.

That said, the system we work on has evolved so far from V5R1 that I know there has to be more complexity in the manuals. It just seems like there should be some kind of middle ground.

I very much appreciate your assistance Rob, Brent

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of rob@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 9:36 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: Two trigger programs allowed on a file. Maybe more allowed?

Don't blame it on the manuals - blame it on misuse of the manuals.
You CANNOT use the top url in your browser to get to the point you are currently at in the manual.
You need to find a point which will point to that point. A blue highlighted area for example like http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/iseries/v7r1m0/topic/db2/rbafzlimtabs.htm
In Firefox I right click on the blue highlighted area and select "Copy Link Location".

Information Center, Availability, Database and SQL limits, SQL limits

Triggers
Maximum number of triggers on a table 300

You can also search Infocenter for system limitations. That's how I originally found this. Back in the old manuals you are so fond of I don't think they had this. It was a separate manual entitled system limitations or some such thing.

If you search for Maximum triggers you will see SQL Limits on the results list, granted tis would have been nice to be closer to the top.


Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.