|
Forgive me for butting in here, because I have absolutely no experience
with VIOS or blades or PureFlex or whatever, but a thought keeps creeping
into my head.
We're going backwards.
The IBM i is supposed to be simple to manage. This doesn't sound like it's
making things simpler. Are we going to get to a point where the "Laughing
Boardroom" ads don't apply anymore?
Just my .02.
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Vernon Hamberg<vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> I won't say that the FSM of PureFlex does everything, but I believe it
> IS a graphical interface to managing those boxes - wouldn't it be nice
> to get that for other places?
>
> Has anyone used it? Is it much more GUI than, say, HMC?
>
> On 5/21/2013 6:08 AM,rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > VIOS is probably linux based. And many of those Linux propeller heads>
> > aren't as open to GUI as IBM i users are. At least that's what IBM told
> > me when I asked for an enhancement to System i Navigator for Windows
> > support for semaphores and threads. They rejected the request because
> > true aficionados of semaphores and threads eschew GUI.
> >
> >
> > Rob Berendt
> --
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.