Re: massive document storage in the IFS - how to handle Mimix -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: massive document storage in the IFS - how to handle Mimix
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 14:40:11 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Vern,

It's not that it's on a SAN that makes all the difference. It's that the
SAN is not running under IBM i that makes the difference. You're mapping
to it. Like mapping to a Windows drive. There's no IBM i object
ownership involved.

Unless they are talking about an IASP type SAN. But I think that would
still involve object ownership I believe.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: massive document storage in the IFS - how to handle Mimix , Vern Hamberg

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.