× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. May 2013

Re: massive document storage in the IFS - how to handle Mimix

Hi Rob

Yeah, that sounds right - of course, I wonder if being on a SAN through NFS or even QNTC is something that is almost synonymous with ownership coming from elsewhere. Are there situations where objects on a SAN are considered to be ON the IBM i? I had meant "on a SAN" to be about access through non-native protocols like NFS.

Just have to explain better, eh?

Vern

----- Original Message -----
Vern,

It's not that it's on a SAN that makes all the difference. It's that the
SAN is not running under IBM i that makes the difference. You're mapping
to it. Like mapping to a Windows drive. There's no IBM i object
ownership involved.

Unless they are talking about an IASP type SAN. But I think that would
still involve object ownership I believe.


Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.