|
That is to say, if there was a large entry that existed in the
prior DSPJRN, and the same range of sequence numbers were displayed
again, one should expect the same results should be seen. I would
conclude more likely that either the same range is not being
displayed, some entries are being excluded from that range in the
newer requests, or if the request is indeed identical each time
then there was more probably a defect encountered that for some
reason is no longer being exhibited.
<ed: additional text was snipped>
Your conclusion would be incorrect, Chuck. You're assuming the
contents of the journal receivers are the same and the command is
different. Both are bad assumptions.
The DSPJRN commands are exactly the same. I am comparing the results
of a completely unfiltered DSPJRN from yesterday and the same command
executed today.
The content of the receivers is different. These receivers are
detached and deleted regularly and only a finite span of time is
available in the journal at any point in time. It's quite possible
that the large entry was available in yesterday's receivers and not
today's.
In any case, the situation is gone. I will monitor it and if it
occurs again I will try to see what caused the entry. Until then,
since the entry causing the problem is gone, there is no way to do
any further analysis.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.