× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. February 2011

Re: 7.1 gets stricter on SQL

I hope they don't use it. I know Java dev's that use JPA love to use ID for
the primary key. As Pete says too, Rails uses it too. I can only hope it
goes away. I've started naming any new ID fields I create differently.
--
James R. Perkins


On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 13:52, Charles Wilt <charles.wilt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I think I'd call that a bug....

ID seems to be a pretty common column name for SQL based applications,
particularly on other DB's. Which means IBM's reservation of ID on
DB2 for i is going to cause nightmares for porting/ported apps.

Charles


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.