Re: Cume PTF -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Absolutely it does. However I know of no way to get 'ALL' PTFs for a release so I got ahold of everything I possibly could. In addition if you look closely enough many groups include other groups. For example Websphere groups in include the DB group, the HTTP group and the JAVA group. So no I didn't actually quintuple the PTF count, or even close to that most likely, but I did give it 'Maximum Stress'. Most likely the best test is to start with a fresh install from PID media and then lay on every PTF available in one go. Not really all that fun but if you really want a stress test.....

- DrFranken

On 10/22/2010 12:39 AM, PaulMmn wrote:

Doesn't the cume overlap (somewhat) with the all the rest? So are you really quintuppling the number of PTFs?

--Paul E Musselman
PaulMmn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

At 8:46 PM -0400 10/21/10, DrFranken wrote (in part):

I last tested this with V5R4M0 base load and then applying every
PTF group I had available including CUME, DB, HIPER, HTTP, JAVA, Windows
Integration, TCP, PRINT, Websphere and probably more. It did not break.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.