× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. October 2010

Re: Cume PTF

I don't think you get multiple entries - that'd be silly if IBM did it that way.

Last time I got a link loader error was when trying to get caught up on a v5r1 machine - I mean REALLY caught up. There were tons of PTFs, and the link loader process couldn't handle the quantity, as Larry described. Now I keep more current than I did.

Vern

Doesn't the cume overlap (somewhat) with the all the rest? So are
you really quintuppling the number of PTFs?

--Paul E Musselman
PaulMmn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


At 8:46 PM -0400 10/21/10, DrFranken wrote (in part):
I last tested this with V5R4M0 base load and then applying every
PTF group I had available including CUME, DB, HIPER, HTTP, JAVA, Windows
Integration, TCP, PRINT, Websphere and probably more. It did not break.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.