× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.




Another thing an organization will probably find by giving thin clients a
try is that there are probably WAY fewer users that need full PC
capabilities than you would think. We have found that over around 100
client machines, there are only FIVE users in our organization that need
capabilities above and beyond a thin client running 5250 emulation and
Citrix ICA. Two of those five are IT administrators. The IT Director and
programming staff all work from thin clients.

If your organization is willing to fully buy into the thin client solution,
that's where the real benefits come in. We are a fairly small organization
and have helped keep the IT admin staff small with thin clients. Keeping a
rough tally of such factors as maintenance savings, longer life cycles for
the hardware, and manpower/admin savings, we have saved $2 million plus
over the 10 years we have used thin clients. If you factor in other less
quantifiable items like a more stable environment for the users and power
costs, the savings are even better.


|------------>
| From: |
|------------>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|Lukas Beeler <lukas.beeler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| To: |
|------------>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Date: |
|------------>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|12/03/2009 04:35 PM |
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Subject: |
|------------>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|Re: Thin client or linux PC? |
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Sent by: |
|------------>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|





On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 21:57, James Rich <james@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I have a customer who is interested in replacing their multiple Windows
PCs with a low maintenance solution.

As far as i know, there is no low maintenance solution. You will
either need to maintain several clients or several thin clients and a
terminal servers. Everything needs to be kept up-to-date and secure.

Moving from desktop based computing to server based computing has
several advantages, and several disadvantages. For example, a terminal
server is a lot more complex than a single computer - if you have an
issue on your terminal server, it can be harder to debug and an outage
will always affect multiple clients.

Then again, terminal servers radically simplify remote access and make
it easier to move from desk to desk.

Could anyone with experience please give recommendations?

Well, this is impossible without knowing a heck a lot more about your
customer. For example, for very small customers with no on-site IT
staff, running multiple stand alone computers is often a better choice
than running a terminal servers.

I've made very good experiences with Igel Thin Clients
(http://www.igel.com/). They offer a comprehensive suite of management
software that allows easy Thin Client management and updates. I've
only used them with Citrix servers though.

--
Read my blog at http://projectdream.org
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.