×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Mark,
There is a section in IBM's Security Manual called "Verify passwords when
changing password levels". I'd recommend checking that along the way.
Rich Loeber
Kisco Information Systems
http://www.kisco.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Allen wrote:
Powers to be have "finally" decided that Windows/network and 400 password
rules be identical. There are 2 areas I have a question on before I do it.
Currently the QPWDLMTCHR value is set to #$_@ and they want be to allow any
characters.
Is there any system/technical reason they should not be allowed on the 400
or was this just a "choice" made by whoever set it to this value eons ago.
QPWDLVL is set to 0 (allow passwords to be 1-10 long) and we need to change
it to 2 (allow 1-128) but set the QPWDMAXLEN to 32.
Any gotchas there especially concerning mapped drives user have to
directories on the IFS?
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.