Re: Password Setup

["Mark Allen" <scprideandms@xxxxxxxxx>]

That's what I asked and its a "we will when the 400 goes away in 2
years...(ha)" we want this put in till then.......

On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:15 PM, <lgoodbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Why not implement EIM if the intent is for user IDs and passwords to be
> identical?
>
> Loyd Goodbar
> Business Systems
> BorgWarner Shared Services
> 662-473-5713
> -----Original Message-----
> From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mark Allen
> Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 1:04 PM
> To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
> Subject: Password Setup
>
> Powers to be have "finally" decided that Windows/network and 400
> password
> rules be identical.  There are 2 areas I have a question on before I do
> it.
>
> Currently the QPWDLMTCHR value is set to #$_@ and they want be to allow
> any
> characters.
>
> Is there any system/technical reason they should not be allowed on the
> 400
> or was this just a "choice" made by whoever set it to this value eons
> ago.
>
>
> QPWDLVL is set to 0 (allow passwords to be 1-10 long) and we need to
> change
> it to 2 (allow 1-128) but set the QPWDMAXLEN to 32.
>
> Any gotchas there especially concerning mapped drives user have to
> directories on the IFS?
>
>
>
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.