Why not implement EIM if the intent is for user IDs and passwords to be
BorgWarner Shared Services
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mark Allen
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 1:04 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Password Setup
Powers to be have "finally" decided that Windows/network and 400
rules be identical. There are 2 areas I have a question on before I do
Currently the QPWDLMTCHR value is set to #$_@ and they want be to allow
Is there any system/technical reason they should not be allowed on the
or was this just a "choice" made by whoever set it to this value eons
QPWDLVL is set to 0 (allow passwords to be 1-10 long) and we need to
it to 2 (allow 1-128) but set the QPWDMAXLEN to 32.
Any gotchas there especially concerning mapped drives user have to
directories on the IFS?
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact