Why not implement EIM if the intent is for user IDs and passwords to be

Loyd Goodbar
Business Systems
BorgWarner Shared Services
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mark Allen
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 1:04 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Password Setup

Powers to be have "finally" decided that Windows/network and 400
rules be identical. There are 2 areas I have a question on before I do

Currently the QPWDLMTCHR value is set to #$_@ and they want be to allow

Is there any system/technical reason they should not be allowed on the
or was this just a "choice" made by whoever set it to this value eons

QPWDLVL is set to 0 (allow passwords to be 1-10 long) and we need to
it to 2 (allow 1-128) but set the QPWDMAXLEN to 32.

Any gotchas there especially concerning mapped drives user have to
directories on the IFS?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.