RE: power line (AS/400) article in computerworld

["Crump, Mike" <Mike.Crump@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Or perhaps beating a dead horse is completely acceptable and it
generates all kinds of responses to which the argument can be carried
out and won by the original poster thereby carrying on the cause (the
dead horse) and stroking the ego.....  :-)

Michael Crump
 
Manager, Computing Services
Saint-Gobain Containers, Inc.
1509 S. Macedonia Ave.
Muncie, IN  47302
765.741.7696
765.741.7012 f 

This email and its attachments may be confidential and are intended
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views
or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of Saint-Gobain.  <redaction>.  If you are
not the intended recipient of this email and its attachments, you must
take no action based upon them, nor must you copy or show them to
anyone.  Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this
email in error.

Police in Britain using a radar gun noted a reading of more than 300
mph, just before their equipment fried. Seconds later a low-flying
Harrier jet hurtled past. The police complained to the Royal Air Force
about the damage to their equipment, but the police were told to
consider themselves lucky. The Harrier's target-seeker had locked onto
the radar and triggered an automatic retaliatory air-to-surface attack.
Fortunately for the police, the Harrier was not armed with missiles.
 
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Booth Martin
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 2:27 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: power line (AS/400) article in computerworld

It does seem to me though that there is something more going on with 
these types of posts.  Why are the posts even made?  I sincerely believe

there is no malevolence or malice intended or desired, but I do wonder 
why one would bother with the platform and especially this forum if it 
is so ill-fitted to their needs and temperament.   Why?   It might be a 
tad easier to accept the comments, and also easier to respond (or not) 
if we had a better idea of  why the posts are being made?



Crump, Mike wrote:
> Different points of view are needed.  However, there is a trend that
is
> occurring that makes those who won't discuss alternatives look open
> minded:
>
> -Hey, did you see the V6R1 announcements?
> Doesn't matter. IBM isn't investing in i5/os
> -What about PowerVM/VIOS, Storage Space snapshots, ITJ improvements
> Doesn't matter. V6R1 didn't bring much new stuff to the table
> -Or I5/OS file level backups for Linux, DB2 enhancements including
> Omnifind
> Doesn't matter. DB2 for i5/OS can't do what other databases do
> -Or RPG enhancements like local files in subprocedures, result DS with
> EXFMT
> Doesn't matter RPG sucks when compared to other languages
> -Or larger fields, arrays and data structures , no imit on DIM and
> OCCURS
> Doesn't matter it takes longer to write an app on i5/os than windows.
> -Or....
> Doesn't matter, every piece of hardware has a 95% markup
> -Or....
> Doesn't matter.  It hasn't fundemetally changed in 10 years.  The only
> thing that has changed is HMC V7 GUI.  Probably produced by the P
guys.
> And the darn objects still only have 10 characters.
>
> It's one thing to ignore opportunities of improvement but it's another
> to post like a force of change when it really seems like the posts are
> just simply contumacious.  These posts are not one bit better than
those
> who refuse to look at alternatives.  You might want to think so and
hold
> those posts as some sort of altruistic discussion but they sure don't
> seem to be.  And that is the effect that they have on a lot of other
> posters.  In any discussion you will most likely get these kinds of
> diametrically opposed positions but neither is better than the
other....
>  
>
> Michael Crump
>  
> Manager, Computing Services
> Saint-Gobain Containers, Inc.
> 1509 S. Macedonia Ave.
> Muncie, IN  47302
> 765.741.7696
> 765.741.7012 f 
>
> This email and its attachments may be confidential and are intended
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any
views
> or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
> necessarily represent those of Saint-Gobain.  <redaction>.  If you are
> not the intended recipient of this email and its attachments, you must
> take no action based upon them, nor must you copy or show them to
> anyone.  Please contact the sender if you believe you have received
this
> email in error.
>
> Leaders
> Leaders are like eagles.  We don't have either of them here.
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Walden H.
Leverich
> Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 11:33 AM
> To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
> Subject: RE: power line (AS/400) article in computerworld
>
> First, while I don't always agree w/what Steve has to say, I
appreciate
> him saying it. There are several of us (yes, I'll include myself) that
> question some things on the System i, push alternatives like .Net, and
> will point out that while the System i is stable, so are other
> platforms. It's those that won't look at and won't discuss
alternatives
> that scare me. It's those with their heads in the sand that get
totally
> blown away when something new and better comes along.
>
> OK, having said that..
>
>   
> > Increasing the pointer size by a factor of 4 should be well
> > within the performance capabilities of modern day hardware.
> >     
>
> You'd think. But I thought part of the performance improvement in the
J9
> JVM came from the fact that it was 32-bit not 64-bit based and
therefore
> faster. So evidence would seem to the contrary.
>
> -Walden
>
>