Volume and revenue are both important but they can have different
impacts. I'm not getting into the whole IBM doesn't give us all the
numbers we want or need argument because we have never had them (even in
the days of huge growth). It would be best if both those numbers were
positive but if one is up and one is done that isn't necessarily a bad
thing. Both down and it's not a good thing. One helps IBM a lot and
the other helps the ISV market a lot.
Not to sound to rah rah but something I just learned is that last year
IBM sold twice as many 570-MMA's as they had planned. 570-MMA's just
absolutely rock. Very good on the volume aspect and a decent impact on
Manager, Computing Services
Saint-Gobain Containers, Inc.
1509 S. Macedonia Ave.
Muncie, IN 47302
This email and its attachments may be confidential and are intended
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views
or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of Saint-Gobain. <redaction>. If you are
not the intended recipient of this email and its attachments, you must
take no action based upon them, nor must you copy or show them to
anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this
email in error.
The enemy invariably attacks on one of two occasions: 1. When
you're ready for them. 2. When you're not ready for them.
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Booth Martin
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 7:34 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Any comments on Fontecchio's blog?
25 percent volume growth . . . definitely a nice uptick in sales. Volume
is far different from revenue, of course, especially as the price of
small systems edges lower. "
Now I am more confused. What is "volume", if not revenue?
Trevor Perry wrote:
Where are you being told that IBM is not selling anything?
Read some of Mark Shearer's words here:
"In my first two and half years in System i, I got an awful lot of
from clients that they wanted to pay for what they use, that they
to improve the price-to-value ratio . . . and we relaunched our entire
entry-level product line back in April -- that ultimately drove more
percent volume growth last year in System i."
On 3/6/08 5:59 PM, "Booth Martin" <booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
All I know, Trevor, is that T J Watson, Sr. built a great company on
premise that nothing happens until a salesman sells something.
I agree, there is an exciting story to sell. But where are the
Why isn't IBM selling something?