"Is this any different than many win servers still running Win2000 ?"
I think so. While there may be plenty of W2K servers out there I'd
question what they are really running. Business applications or
infrastructure applications? File server, print server, DNS, DC, cute
little freeware application, etc. Am I developing on one vs. the other?
If I'm developing or modifying applications then I'm assuming that there
is some sort of inferred progress going on. What is the investment into
one vs. the other? If you were investing more money or programming time
wouldn't you expect to put more into that investment to protect it? And
I've yet to hear of a W2K server replaced by a System i because the W2K
server wasn't considered modern. However, I've seen plenty of old
AS/400's and systems with old releases replaced by WINTEL solutions.
Those replacements might have happened no matter what.
We have a perception issue - I just think that all of these old
installations that are on old hardware or old releases are adding to it.
Plenty of other factors are involved of course.
Michael Crump
Manager, Computing Services
Saint-Gobain Containers, Inc.
1509 S. Macedonia Ave.
Muncie, IN 47302
765.741.7696
765.741.7012 f
Combat will occur on the ground between two adjoining maps.
This email and its attachments may be confidential and are intended
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views
or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of Saint-Gobain. If it did, it would be
folded, mutilated, watered down, politically corrected, and would show
up a week later if at all. If you are not the intended recipient of
this email and its attachments, you must take no action based upon them,
nor must you copy or show them to anyone.
Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in
error.
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jim Franz
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 6:38 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: New redpaper: i5/OS Program Conversion: Getting readyfor
i5/OSV6R1
Holy *&^%. That might help partially explain why the system is not
considered modern.......V5R1 was announced in 2001, V5R2 was announced
in 2002, V5R3 announced in 2004. Makes almost any other Wintel or
Unix
system look like it is comparatively ultra modern to i5/OS when in
fact
it isn't.
Is this any different than many win servers still running Win2000 ?
...
I'm working on a customer's upgrade from v4r5 (a 720) to new box & v5r4.
The ONLY reason it took them so long to upgrade was a (non-IT)
management
mentality that replaces equipment only when forced to (the lack of
horsepower and disk finally got enough mid managers to scream, even
though end users had been complaining for years).
Jim Franz
midrange.com
