|
Yes but it would be nice if IBM allowed you to put one in to upgrade mode while the other took over. When the upgrade of the first is done, take over control of system and push the update to the other FSP behind the sceens. Christopher Bipes Information Services Director CrossCheck, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of lbolhuis@xxxxxxxxxx Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 6:20 AM To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion Cc: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion Subject: RE: i5 Firmware to HMC Code level table? Rob, Do you relly want your FSPs at different levels? This to me sounds like two versions of Order Entry out there both pounding on the same set of files. If the versions are different would you not expect them to behave differently? If so what happens to your data, can it even be predicted? As the FSPs are in control of the heart of your machine would you not want them doing exactly and I do mean EXACTLY the same thing? If they were different then I would expect a cold frame reboot to switch between them and that can be done today between the "T" and "P" sides even on a single FSP machine. For them to fail over they need to be completely and totally in sync or as we have so often heard: "Unpredictable results will occur." (And it is highly unlikly these results would be good.)
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.