|
Daily, I send files manually to a vendor using a Windows client - FileZilla. Our system now has PASE and sftp. And, I was able to send a file that way as well. The problem is that they change servers at somewhat random intervals. FileZilla manages to update whatever needs updating and things continue on nicely. The technical person at the client end, seemingly familiar with sftp, does not know how to coax sftp to behave in the same manner as FileZilla does. Which brings up a bunch of questions, these for openers: 1) Is FileZilla performing some tasks without benefit of encryption? 2) How is FileZilla able to so easily deal with a change in the host? 3) Can sftp be configured to be tolerant of machine changes? 4) Should it even be considered? I can likely think of more to add to the above. Right now, this FileZilla thing is kind of like a leash. Somebody has to use a pc DAILY (thankfully, only Monday-Friday) to transfer data. The only method that the vendor will support is sftp - which, compared to plain jane FTP, is not as predictable as far as determining success/failure under program control. By that, I mean that sftp does not utilize numeric codes - at least not that I have seen as yet. Thus, determining "success" or "failure" does not appear to be simple - when done with program code. Any thoughts? John McKee
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.