× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



In some ways the client doesn't need to be proprietary.  I manage my
wireless router, my SAN tape drives, etc. using other peoples
proprietary clients.  It's doable.

And keep in mind it doesn't necessarily have to be complicated nor does
it have to make complete sense.  There have been people that have said
on this list as well as people I've talked to personally who have said
'It doesn't have a native GUI and I see that as a major problem'.  I
myself do not see that as a valid business nor technical decision.
However, remember one of the areas of interest is to help compel people
who work on other platforms to adopt the System i.  This could help
assist existing customers plus help the system adopt some others.
Fighting every aspect on the rest of the industry may not be the answer.

Michael Crump
 
Manager, Computing Services
Saint-Gobain Containers, Inc.
1509 S. Macedonia Ave.
Muncie, IN  47302
 
765.741.7696
765.741.7012 f 
 


Consulting
If you are not part of the solution, there's good money to be made in
prolonging the problem.
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nathan Andelin
Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2006 6:15 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Saving the System i: Fight Rather Than Switch

Aaron Bartell wrote:


I think IBM would be best to go the proprietary UI route
and create their own thin client that has predefined sets of
controls that aid RPG programmers in building incredibly
solid GUI interfaces.
 
If IBM were to take your suggestion, and develop their own proprietary
client, how well would it compete against Firefox, Internet Explorer,
and Macromedia Flash, to name just three alternatives?
 
I don't think extremely productive applications can be built
in the browser.
 
You're not alone in this Aaron, and I would agree that most browser
based interfaces are less productive than 5250 when it comes to data
entry and maintenance, but I think I could change your mind with a brief
demo of a model I developed for database inquiry and maintenance, using
just HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and RPG.  Send me a private email if you'd
be interested in scheduling a "GotoMeeting" session.
 
Nathan.


 
________________________________________________________________________
____________
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.