|
Peter, Are the programs doing the override ILE or not - that would make the difference. With ILE, you get a mix of ILE (my program) and non-ILE (IBM's programming for FTP). My program runs in one activation group, IBM's in another. With ILE, if I take the default for the override, it only overrides at the activation group level. I needed to override at the JOB level to get IBM's programming to see my files. I am also on V5R4, and that might make some difference, although I have had override issues at 5.1 and 5.2 levels. Activation groups have not changed that much from V5R1 to V5R4. Jim On 10/4/06, Peter Dow (ML) <maillist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Jim, Elvis, That's odd. I have customers with V5R1 and V5R3, both using a similar CLP that does the two overrides then the FTP command; neither of the overrides specifies the scope, and the default on both systems is the activation group, yet they've been working for years running it in batch. APAR *SE19855 indicates that it applies to V5R1, V5R2, and V5R3, and it didn't mention any PTF to change the behavior of FTP. Why is it working!? **Peter Dow* / Dow Software Services, Inc. 909 793-9050 pdow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:pdow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> /
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.