× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



In my opinion the best tool for text input is the human voice. IBM and the competition have developed solutions that can compensate for human pronounciation variations, such as regional dialect, using a second language, and context for words that sound the same like "too" "two" "to" but seems to me this technology has been slow to be deployed, perhaps because it needs more hardware gas than many other ingredients, resulting in the users having to speak artificially slow.

Do we talk faster, or type faster, accurately?

Actually the human brain goes faster than either talking or typing, but I not want to suggest research into figuring out how to do direct input, since the privacy and security abuses could be astronomical.

> A mouse was designed to be productive, and it can be.

For certain tasks, yes.  Text entry does not happen to be one of them.
It's the classic "use the right tool for the right job".



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.