|
Doug, This is a VERY good point.Why ARE we making our users spend more "key time" than "think time"? Should we not be leveraging the human brain for its capacity to THINK? Leave the boring stuff to the machines?
Trevor----- Original Message ----- From: "Douglas Handy"
Subject: Re: The Perpetual Myth of iSeries Obsolescence
Trevor, Again, I think this is very misguided.. A mouse was designed to beproductive, and it can be.For certain tasks, yes. Text entry does not happen to be one of them.It's the classic "use the right tool for the right job". The mouse is verygood for some things. But if your task involves much text entry, movingeven one hand off home typing position and back again is slower than using akeyboard shortcut. Being busy is not the same thing as being productive. On the other hand, the higher the ratio of "think time" to "key time" in a task, the less important it becomes. And if text entry is only anincidental part of the process instead of a major component, then it is alsonot as serious. For sure, the mouse has its place. And between the G & H keys on the Thinkpad's keyboard was a good place for it. :-P Doug
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.