|
Glenn, Wow! Lots of suggestions - and I don't like any of them :) I guess that's not completely true, because I agree with those that suggest disabling profiles is an incomplete solution because it does not bounce users who are already working on your files - if they are active at the time you disable them, they will still be active and could potentially muck with your files even after you disable them. The suggestions regarding QINTER, or the user's initial program (INLPGM) are unappealing because they assume that users can only connect to the database through workstation (telnet) devices - and that is simply not accurate. Even if you end QINTER, your users can still launch ODBC or FTP request against your files. And even if they don't change the data, they could still lock the files and mangle your other process. (And now I'll put my security hat on and say that this can be a problem 24x7 - but list members have heard this refrain from me too often). Allocating the library is not an option because A)You cannot exclusively lock (*EXCL) a library (the ALCOBJ command won't let you), and B)Though you can get an exclusive read-only lock (*EXCLRD) on the library, a read-only lock will not prevent someone from changing the contents of a database file that resides in that library :( I think your best option is to lock the individual files in question. If there are a lot of them, you can list them in a file and spin through the list with a program. The only complication you'll have is writing an exception routine to deal with any file that cannot be allocated (send a message to the User, or QSYSOPR, etc.). This is the only method I have seen that is sure to keep users out of the files - everything else is a "best guess". That's my .02. jte -- John Earl | Chief Technology Officer The PowerTech Group 19426 68th Ave. S Seattle, WA 98032 (253) 872-7788 ext. 302 john.earl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx www.powertech.com This email message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the intended recipients and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you received this email message in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this email message, or by telephone, and delete the message from your email system. -- > -----Original Message----- > From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l- > bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thompson, Glenn > Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 9:13 AM > To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion > Subject: Technical and Philosophy > > I'm new to at the Iseries world and I need some help both, > technical and > philosophical. > > > > I need to keep users out of my files after 7:00 PM. > Someone has > suggested that we allocate the files and that would keep > the users out. > Another suggestion was that we secure the users out by > disabling the > user profiles. > > > > Which approach would be best/easiest? > > > > > > -- > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion > (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list > To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: > http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l > or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Before posting, please take a moment to review the > archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l. >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.