Re: Say Hello to IBM System i5!

Trevor Perry wrote:

>> You're certainly entitled to your own opinion Trevor.
> Ending a debate in this manner does not improve the position of your 
> opinion.

Obviously, it's more important for you as vendor to persist on your
views of application "transformation".

I don't share yours that business apps are inheritantly modal or need to
be modal and thus make a refacing tool OK.  I'm sure there are cases
where such a tool is appropriate (B2B,B2C, casual/occasional users), but
from what I've seen, management tends not to see much ROI in refacing
their core 5250 applications (by 5250 I mean terminal not the data stream).


>> If true, then you just need to get the word out.
> I am. Now ~you~ know, and some more midrange-L readers know. 

If you make the case, open mind people will buy it.