|
Yet given all that, it's the interface that leaves the biggest impression. 5250 is killing the AS400/iSeries/i5 (and these name changes aren't helping). Keith michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > And another point...if you think about improvements and changes to a > system, I don't think there's a system out there that's had more > changes than an iSeries. Using virtualization from the mainframe and > UNIX shells from UNIX and the ability to host multiple OS's (ala VM), > the iSeries has had more changes than any system I know of, except > maybe for mainframes. > >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Re: Say Hello to IBM System i5! >> From: Jerry Adams <jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Thu, February 02, 2006 10:41 am >> To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> I realize that Unix is an operating system and that SQL is a language, >> but I recall hearing about both of those back in the 70's when I started >> out. >> >> >> My point being: Unix and SQL are both legacy products. Which would >> make Oracle, SQL Server, AIX, Linux (a Unix wannabe), and their ilk all >> legacy. >> >> >> That is not to say that any of these have stood still; to the best of my >> knowledge there have been incremental improvements to each. Just as >> there have been incremental improvements to the AS/400 -> iSeries -> i5. >> >> >> So the next time some eunuch (pardon me, Unix) 'guru' or SQL (any >> variety) wiz kid throws the word 'legacy' into a conversation regarding >> the iSeries, just look 'im in the eye and with a condescending look say, >> 'You're sh*****g me. Right?' >> >> >> And, just for the record, Bell Labs invented Unix, and IBM invented >> SQL. Not Oracle, not Microsoft, not Sun. And who leads the world in >> patents again? It sure ain't Oracle, or Microsoft, or any of those wiz >> kids' favorites. I don't have any idea how many have been used in the >> iSeries, but certainly quite a number. >> >> >> * Jerry C. Adams >> *iSeries Programmer/Analyst >> B&W Wholesale Distributors, Inc.* * >> voice >> 615.995.7024 >> fax >> 615.995.1201 >> email >> jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> >> >> fbocch2595@xxxxxxx wrote: >> >>> It's easy to lump all IBM machines, whether mainframe or midrange, as >>> legacy, don't you think? >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Keith Carpenter <carpcon@xxxxxxx> >>> To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Sent: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:21:54 -0800 >>> Subject: Re: Say Hello to IBM System i5! >>> >>> >>> >>> The large consulting firms who recommend new systems just call it legacy. >>> >>> >>> Jeff Crosby wrote: >>> >>> >>>>> Whatever the name, >>>>> seems I always end up having to use "AS/400" as part of the >>>>> definition. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Not to mention that even the Rochester IBMers refer to it as AS/400 to this >>>> day. They are in conversations with me this very morning. >>>> >>>> >>>> >> -- >> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list >> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx >> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, >> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l >> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx >> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives >> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l. >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.