|
Hi, If you have BRMS, use BRMS. We do not have BRMS. But since V5R3, SAVSYS can run in batch mode and ENDSBS has the DELAY parameter (STRSBS automatically initiated after this delay time). So we can start automatically a GO SAVE 21 like job running in QCTL. We run that job once a week. Our production system is a i520 and we have also a test (820) and a backup system (720). I could totally load the i520 system on 820 and on 720 without any problem by using the backup tape issued from this GO SAVE 21 job. You have only to adapt the configuration. We also use IBM's UNIX system, AIX, on several servers. We could experience that reloading a system from one platform to another works well, even if the 2 servers are different models. I know it works on our big MVS systems too. So IBM made good job in restoring systems. What about Windows ? I agree that restoring Windows systems on servers is not so easy... Try and we speak about. JCM -----Message d'origine----- De : midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de msmith6@xxxxxxxxxxxx Envoyé : jeudi 1 décembre 2005 15:03 À : midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx Objet : Re: Creating nightly full backups (Lukas Beeler) You programmers are right. You can only get the *SAVSYS when the system is in restricted mode. Not really that big of a deal because that only changes when you put PTFs or upgrade OS. Do a full system save and send that off site, at the same time make a *SAVSYS tape that you can leave 'at the office' if it's that important. Do yourself a favor and start using BRMS. Every night make sure the last thing you do is backup the object information in the BRMS databases. When you run the maintenance job everyday (expires tapes, moves them from location to location, etc), you get an awesome report that tells you step by step how to restore the system. As a side note, ask the Windows guys if they've ever tried to restore that *full system save* on another system? I bet they haven't. Windows doesn't like being restored to different hardware. Our Distributed Conmputing team moved to running alot the Windows servers on VMWare just for that reason since VMWare vitualizes the hardware. Hmm, where have I seem a system that does that for you? When we went to our IBM disaster recovery test, I would restore the Mainframe (in a VM partition) and iSeries without any problems and they'd be pounding their heads on the wall. I don't know if you have a disaster recovery contract with anyone or need one for that matter, but we have ours with IBM. In addition to the nice report that BRMS, IBM supplies me with a step by step screen shot writeup to IPL the system from tape, selecting disk from DST, etc. m. > message: 3 > date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 08:07:44 +0100 > from: "Lukas Beeler" <l.beeler@xxxxxxxxxxx> > subject: Creating nightly full backups > > Hi, > > I work at a rather small iSeries ISV. > > We have a 270 with around 70GB DASD, around 25GB used. This > machine runs > V5R3M0. > > A few days ago, i had an interesting discussion with our developers > while thinking about a new backup concept (we just replaced our old > windows 2000 server with a windows 2003 one). > > On our windows and linux machines, i run nightly full backups, which > allow for an easy and fast system restore. These backups are > completelyautomated, incur no downtime at all, our administative > personal just has > to change the tapes. > > On our iSeries however, we don't have anything like it. We do daily > backups of our data and program libraries, but this requires our ERP > software to shut down. Also, monthly (SAVLIB *NONSYS) and system > backups(SAVSYS) require an attended backup. > > I would like to get this process up to date, running a nightly full > backup which contains a SAVLIB *NONSYS and a SAVSYS, which should > allowus to restore using a single tape. Our iSeries developers (which, > contrary to myself have a large amount of experience on the iSeries) > said that this couldn't be done. > > We do have BRMS licensed, but we don't use it (yet). I also read > about a > "Save while Active" feature, which should allow to save librarys while > they are in use. > > Is there really no possibility to achieve something like that? Our > iseries system was far more expensive than our windows machine > (including all software licenses), but doesn't have the > possibility to > do a decent, unattended full backup? I learned to like this platform, > but this looks like a rather big drawback > > Hopefully you guys can tell me that we just didn't look at the right > place. > > Thanks in Advance, > > Lukas Beeler >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.