|
Did you customize the jobs for NFS and loose those when you upgraded OS? For instance, You can change the subsystem, memory pool, time slice, and run priority of the jobs. Some is in the job description, subsystem description, and class. Those customizations may have been lost. Chris Bipes Information Services Director CrossCheck, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ingvaldson, Scott Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 8:55 AM To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: Is anyone using NFS? When we first set this up about 2 years ago NFS gave us about a three-fold performance increase over NetServer attached drives. We have been using the same (4.13) client this whole time. Xlink says that this is the "current" version. What we are doing is converting metacode output from our mainframe to pdf documents and then storing them on the iSeries using Content Manager. The conversion application, Xenos d2e, works fine when writing pdf's to local drives but is painfully slow writing to NetServer attached drives. Before the V5R3 upgrade using NFS improved the performance dramatically. Now NFS is slower than NetServer. What I'm really trying to figure out is what changed with the V5R3 upgrade. As the application programmer says, "it worked before, why doesn't it work now?"
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
