× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Dan,

You can give the LF a different record format name then the PFILE it is based 
upon. You can not use the FORMAT key word, however. 

You have to name each field in the LF again, that should be accessed with the 
LF. One advantage: if you use all the fields of the PF in that LF and later the 
PF gets expanded with extra fields, not to be used with that LF, you do not 
have to recompile the PGMs using that LF. (hopefully fully understandable this)

Regards,
Carel Teijgeler

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 12-10-05 at 16:09 Dan wrote:

>On 10/12/05, Wilt, Charles <CWilt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Relating to your first question, for the files to be considered the same
>> format, the format names must also match.
>
>
>Hmmm, and no rename keyword for the format name. Bummer.




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.