|
Both the old system and the new one, have (had) a development partitian and a production partition. Relative sizes have not changed. There have been no significant changes in database sizes or the applications. Both Business Partner and IBM have had many engineers working on the problem for a month now and of course, everyone is pointing fingers at everyone else. They have been running every sort of performance management tool you can think of. They have tuned this and that. They have replace card after card. They have tried all sorts of caching schemes. All to no avail.
Lately, they are starting to point fingers at the applications. Now I grant you that our applications are old and could stand much improvement, but they have not changed since before the upgrade. We are embarking on a modernation project in development, but we will not implement any such improvements until the upgrade issues are settled.
The one question I have not been able to get a straight answer out of any of these engineers, and the reason for this post, is what has been the experience of other recent converts to the 570? Or, what has been the experience of other upgraders from V5R2 to V5R3? Particularly in relation to long-running batch jobs. I can't think of anything unique in what we are running. We have very little, if any, embedded SQL. That's the only thing I've seen any complaints about on this list. Has anyone else going to a 570 experienced any sort of major slowdown? At this point, we are willing to look at anything.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.