|
Nathan, >Each measurement has an associated popup, > enabling all measurements to be recorded with just two > (2) mouse clicks. > Something like this challenges the conventional wisdom > that 5250 is always more efficient for data entry. I disagree. Anyone familar with a 10-key number pad will run circles around the mouse clicks by just keying the two digit value. You can do that much faster than you can navigate the mouse to the proper value, and likely have a lower error rate. (It looks pretty easy to click on the wrong value in he 01 to 99 popup to me, if you are trying to move the mouse fast enough to be efficient at this process.) Of course, the browser could have input fields too instead of a popup. I think it can be argued that a GUI interface is easier to train to newbies, but rarely will mouse activies be faster than a trained keyboard user. (I will say that I do like the ability to have accelerator keys to move the cursor to specific input fields. And from that standpoint a GUI *can* be more efficient for even keyboard data entry. But few people seem to design GUI screens with proper keyboard accelerators, which is another of my pet peeves...) Doug
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.