Re: Re: V5R3 cds

[franz400 <franz400@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The respin article in Knowledge Base has Lic Marker PTF to RSx identifier.
jim

>On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 15:35:13 -0500 rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote.
>A cume will not be as good as reloading that code and then applying the 
>new cume.  In fact, systems with Op's console would not even work with 
>RSA.  Our BP borrowed our newer RSx version for a company that was going 
>to upgrade that weekend and needed a newer version faster than waiting for 
>IBM could get it to them.
>
>I forget how you check (DSPPTF?) to see which RSx CD you used.  I assume 
>it's one of the MH marker ptf's.
>
>Rob Berendt
>-- 
>Group Dekko Services, LLC
>Dept 01.073
>PO Box 2000
>Dock 108
>6928N 400E
>Kendallville, IN 46755
>http://www.dekko.com
>
>
>
>
>
>franz400 <franz400@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 
>Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>04/22/2005 03:30 PM
>Please respond to
>Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>To
>midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>cc
>
>Subject
>Re:  V5R3 cds
>
>
>
>
>
>
>I searched the Knowledge Base and found an interesting article: 
>search on "respins" (i guess thats a technical term...)
>These are "resaves" of certain cds shipped with the OS. They started 
>at level RSA, then RSB, RSC, and now RSD. 
>Article does say having a cume updates same info. 
>So what IBM has done is give customers (all or some?) updated copies of 
>certain install cds.
>jim
>
>>On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 11:34:13 -0700 dpalme@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote.
>>We received the same thing, when I called the support line, they had no
>clue 
>>as to why the disks were reissued.  They did ask me to use the new ones 
>>although they had no information on the originals being incorrect.
>>
>>The only difference we could see was our customer number imprinted on the 
>
>>new disks.
>>
>>
>>On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 10:52:58 -0700 (PDT), franz400 wrote
>>> I had installed a new 520 last Dec. In Feb, an order showed up with 
>>> 3 cd's, labelled I_BASE_01, and B2924_01 and B2924_02. No readme on 
>>> the cds. Packing List labelled 3 cds as OS/400 V5, OS/400 V5-01, 
>>> OS/400 V5-02. Received 1 page labelled "GLOBAL LICENSE" and "The 
>>> following products in the invoice have been shipped under the Danish 
>>> License. (machine & software all came from Rochester). Did IBM have 
>>> to re-issue the I_BASE and B2924 cds? Any ideas? Jim Franz
>>> -- 
>>> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) 
>>> mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To 
>>> subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: 
>>> http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or email: 
>>> MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment 
>>> to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>>
>>
>>--
>>Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)
>>
>>-- 
>>This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing 
>list
>>To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
>>visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
>>or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
>>at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>>
>
>-- 
>This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing 
>list
>To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
>visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
>or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
>at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>
>
>-- 
>This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
>To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
>visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
>or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
>at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>