Re: Restore SQL collection to a different name?

[R Bruce Hoffman <bruce.hoffman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 12:33, David Gibbs wrote:

> Unfortunately, something like ErWin just isn't an option.  This is on a
> customers system and we don't have the access that a tool like ErWin
> would require (let alone the tool itself).

I understand.

> Strictly speaking, this kind of thing should be a basic OS400 ability.
> A normal library with database files can be restored to a different
> name, so long as you have all the dependent objects (PF's for all LF's,
> etc).  Not being able to restore a database collection library to a
> different name is a major defect IMHO.  Backing up a database and
> restoring it to a new location is something that should be able to be
> done without any extra effort.

Well, defect... I think what you will hear is "working as designed". I
grant you that it would be much easier if they supported all that
renaming... but do you really want a restore operation mucking around
with data in a file? I may be in the minority here, but I for one don't
want _data_ messed with by the restore itself.

The defect would lie in the restore of the library from a savlib or
other full save to that same name, which, you apparently have here. I
would be interested in the outcome of reporting this to IBM on V5R3.


-- 
"Bigamy is having one wife too many. Monogamy is the same."
-- Oscar Wilde