|
> ... > So I think there is a basic flaw performance-wise in the IFS. I have no idea > why - *TYPE2 was supposed to help, but it is > not enough for me to > recommend iSeries as a file server in a high-demand situation. > Vern I've noticed that, too, and wonder about it frequently. I wonder if there is something I am supposed to be doing to "tune" IFS or if, like you said, there is some basic performance flaw. NetServer shares seem very slow compared to other file servers, even on our best machine with plenty of everything. I suspect this is not due to NetServer itself but due to how long it takes it to access the data from IFS. Or, just go into qshell and copy some files/directories around, or even better, delete some recursively (rm -rf blah). If you're working with a fairly complex directory structure, you will experience a long delay which you do not see on Windows or UNIX or even in z/OS USS. Then I think, if IFS has such a hard time just copying and deleting files, how can it possibly do an acceptable job running major Java applications where the programs and the data make heavy use of stream files in the root and QOpenSys file systems? I would love to hear from any IBMers who may have insight into this. Thanks, -Marty
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.