Re:slow runs -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re:slow runs
From: "Muralidhar Narayana" <Muralidhar_Narayana@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 22:43:59 +0530
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

The major file which is being accessed  was never recreated till Jan2002. But 
however it doesnt contain any deleted records so I didnt do RGZPFM.The cpyf 
command was coded in such a way that it was nt recreated.
 
I just recreated it and copied the same data and ran, it looks to be running 
fast and took less time.
 
Iam not familiar memory theory, I guess the file's location got changed from 
one location to another in memory from where it being accessed , that could be 
reason????????

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re:slow runs , Booth Martin

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.