Re:slow runs

Oh, yeah, what I recommended was using results from a second run of a program 
not the first - this will even out differences due to stuff already in memory. 
In this case, this seems less important, as the files are different and should 
not be available to the job running over (not in) a different library/

Vern
-------------- Original message -------------- 

> The major file which is being accessed was never recreated till Jan2002. But 
> however it doesnt contain any deleted records so I didnt do RGZPFM.The cpyf 
> command was coded in such a way that it was nt recreated. 
> 
> I just recreated it and copied the same data and ran, it looks to be running 
> fast and took less time. 
> 
> Iam not familiar memory theory, I guess the file's location got changed from 
> one 
> location to another in memory from where it being accessed , that could be 
> reason???????? 
> 
> -- 
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list 
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, 
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l 
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives 
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l. 
>