RE: ILE in Default Activaction Group

[CWilt@xxxxxxxxxxxx]

Vance,

I think the detail answer is "it depends ;-)"  You need to know how the
programs ended up in the default activation group.

Are you compiling programs with DFTACTGRP(*YES)
which as I understand it, should pose no problems

or with DFTACTGRP(*NO) ACTGRP(*CALLER)
which as I understand could be a problem.

Charles Wilt
iSeries Systems Administrator / Developer
Mitsubishi Electric Automotive America
ph: 513-573-4343
fax: 513-398-1121
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vance Stanley [mailto:w_vance_stanley@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 12:09 PM
> To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: ILE in Default Activaction Group
> 
> 
> This is probably a tired subject so forgive me..........
>  
>  I am working in a shop where it appears that most ILE 
> programs are running in the Default
> Activaction group.  I was at the IBM Technical conference in 
> Las Vegas A week ago and attended a 
> class that indicated that unpredictable results could occur 
> if you run ILE in the Default
> activation group.  I have also heard that performace issues 
> can arise as well.  Has anyone run
> into problems running ILE in this manner?  Just a note we are 
> not utilizing much object linking.
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion 
> (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>