Re: I5 vs. 810

[Vern Hamberg <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Adam

Basically the same as someone else said about timing. Upgrading to 810 now, 
with a view to going to a 520 in a fairly short time span, can cost more 
than just going to the latest and greatest now. But the "bleeding edge" 
issue also applies.

Hope that made sense.
;-)
Vern

At 10:08 AM 5/18/2004, you wrote:
> not sure what you mean with the 810 now and an i5 a year form now.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Vern Hamberg" <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 10:30 AM
> Subject: Re: I5 vs. 810
>
>
> > All the other repsonses are valid - there are good things and some price
> > advantages in the i5, it seems.
> >
> > But against that is the hassle of a new release. There are always
> problems.
> > Some would say wait until at least the first CUME before getting a new
> > release. You need to weigh costs and benefits, and with a new release,
> > there is likely to be a cost for it getting really shaped up. Put your
> > actuaries on it.  ;-)
> >
> > Of course, there's also the extra cost of a 2-stage purchase in a short
> > time - 810 now, 520 within a year, say.
> >
> > HTH
> > Vern
> >
> > At 08:23 AM 5/18/2004, you wrote:
> > >We had just finished up our quotes for a new 810 when the i5 was
> announced.
> > >I and my compatriot in arms have recommended to the IT Director to not
> worry
> > >about the i5 and just go with the 810.
> > >
> > >We're an insurance company with two computer people running the whole
> > >company.  When we get our new machine, we are basically hooking it up,
> > >transferring data and going live.  We aren't able to beat it up for a
> couple
> > >months to test it first.  This is mainly why I say going with the 810 and
> > >5r2 is the better route, because there are less surprises and our vendor
> has
> > >been using this line for their application for years.
> > >
> > >He (Director) still wants to know the "industry's" opinion on whether we
> > >should go i5 or 810 and whether going to 5r3 is risky or not.
> > >
> > >Do you have any feedback and/or any links for articles about this?
> > >
> > >This is one I have found so far.
> > >http://www.midrangeserver.com/fhg/fhg051204-story05.html
> > >
> > >Adam Lang
> > >Systems Engineer
> > >Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
> > >http://www.rutgersinsurance.com
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
> list
> > To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> > or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> > at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.