|
> From: Walden H. Leverich III > > As for "taking the Belt", what would you require to take the > belt? The only > published numbers I'm aware of are the TPC-C and -W numbers, and Windows > looks good there. "Looks good". But it doesn't win. Besides, those are just statistics. Kind of like comparing 0-60 speed on funny cars. Completely useless. I want real numbers of a company in production for a year or more, with uptime and support costs. Anything less is statistics. > Oh, and the Order detail table had 17,279,759,341 rows (17 Billion) with a > row size of 54 bytes, or a table size of 933,107,004,414 (933TB) for that > table alone. No, the 58TB is _not_ offline storage, it's database storage. Cool. Was this in production? How may users? What was the access time for an order? How many CPUs on the network? How long did it take to back up? Better yet, how long to restore? How many people supported the system? How much did the hardware cost? The software? The electricity? The A/C? How big a room housed this system? How many drives? How many arms? How many tape drives? MTBF? Uptime percentage? How many systems with this capacity in production? Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.