|
>>Joe: >>Show me a Unix box handling thousands of OLTP users >>on gigabyte databases with subsecond response time. > Walden: >Um, TPC-C work for you? Lots of systems there with >sub-second response times across thousands of users >and multi-TERAbyte databases (including, um, uh, >Windows machines <G>). TPC can get a little vague when you talk about processing performed on clients and application servers. The number of users a system is supporting doesn't necessarily translate to OLTP work. Depending on the architecture the online/user work may be deferred to the client or an application server. I'm sure you can find exceptions, but in our Windows systems the OLTP equivalent functions are running on another system. In Unix you can probably find more examples of traditional OLTP type work done on the server, rather than split out to another tier. Still, in the platform bias wars I find a lot of Unix/NT/Oracle admins who will compare their database server to a database/client/batch/reporting/application environment on an AS/400. I don't mind the comparisons as long as we compare the entire architecture. -Jim James P. Damato Manager - Technical Administration Dollar General Corporation <mailto:jdamato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.