|
I've never had to resize QSYSOPR, but there was a new system value added in V4R4 called QCFGMSGQ, which moves many of the (usually) useless messages from QSYSOPR to another message queue, which IBM supplies and curiously calls QCFGMSGQ. I am in the hotel, so I don't have the luxury of a system to play on. See the following page from my COMMON presentation, "Everything You Always Wanted to Know about System Values (but were afraid to ask)": Name: QCFGMSGQ V4 R4.0 Description: Message Queue for Configuration Messages IBM Initial Value: 'QSYSOPR QSYS' Length & Type: Character: 20 Value is a list. Comments: Two values are specified: - Message queue name. - Message queue library. QCFGMSGQ is the system value that allows you to specify a default message queue the system will use when sending messages for lines, controllers and devices. For best overall system results, create the message queue that is specified for this system value with the following attributes: FORCE(*NO) ALWALR(*NO) SIZE (8 32 *NOMAX) MSGQFULL(WRAP) A suggested change to the default is the message queue QSYS/QCFGMSGQ, which is supplied by IBM, and has the above characteristics. A change to this system value takes effect when the line, controller or device description that supports the MSGQ parameter is varied on. User must have *ALLOBJ, *SECADM and *IOSYSCFG authority to change this system value. Note the following admonition that I have regarding this change, when suggesting system values that you might want to change: System Values You Might Want to Change System IBM Initial Suggested Reasoning for Change Value Value New Value QCFGMSGQ 'QSYSOPR QSYS' 'QCFGMSGQ QSYS' This value will significantly reduce the number of message sent to the QSYSOPR message queue into a manageable number of messages. The new message queue should only be consulted for problem resolution, while QSYSOPR should be kept in *BREAK mode during the day to deal with system problems. Note that newly created writers will default their messages to this message queue which may not have the desired effect. Al in Rochester - where it was 87 degrees today. Al Barsa, Jr. Barsa Consulting Group, LLC 400>390 914-251-1234 914-251-9406 fax http://www.barsaconsulting.com http://www.taatool.com Jim Damato <jdamato@xxxxxxxxxxx To: "'midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx'" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> al.com> cc: Sent by: Subject: QSYSOPR size midrange-l-bounces@x idrange.com 04/14/2003 03:31 PM Please respond to Midrange Systems Technical Discussion Has anyone ever had to resize QSYSOPR? Our application software is drowning the operators message queue in meaningless messages. The message full action of *WRAP doesn't work when messages are hitting to fast to wrap. I was gonna create a new message queue named QSYSOPRX in QSYS with either a greater number of increments than QSYSOPR's or *NOMAX. Then I was gonna rename out the old QSYSOPR and rename in the new one, at a point in time when I could log off the operators and get the queue out of *BREAK delivery. Seems kind of scary to me. I'm wondering whether I'd regret setting up QSYSOPR with size of *NOMAX. I'm also wondering whether there's an easier way to tweak the size of a message queue. Any advice or warnings? Much thanks in advance... -Jim James P. Damato Manager - Technical Administration Dollar General Corporation <mailto:jdamato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.