QSYSOPR size

[Jim Damato <jdamato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Has anyone ever had to resize QSYSOPR?  Our application software is drowning
the operators message queue in meaningless messages.    The message full
action of *WRAP doesn't work when messages are hitting to fast to wrap.

I was gonna create a new message queue named QSYSOPRX in QSYS with either a
greater number of increments than QSYSOPR's or *NOMAX.  Then I was gonna
rename out the old QSYSOPR and rename in the new one, at a point in time
when I could log off the operators and get the queue out of *BREAK delivery.

Seems kind of scary to me.  I'm wondering whether I'd regret setting up
QSYSOPR with size of *NOMAX.  I'm also wondering whether there's an easier
way to tweak the size of a message queue.

Any advice or warnings?  Much thanks in advance...

-Jim

James P. Damato
Manager - Technical Administration
Dollar General Corporation
<mailto:jdamato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>